* A Distributed Proofreaders Canada eBook *

 

This eBook is made available at no cost and with very few restrictions. These restrictions apply only if (1) you make a change in the eBook (other than alteration for different display devices), or (2) you are making commercial use of the eBook. If either of these conditions applies, please contact a https://www.fadedpage.com administrator before proceeding. Thousands more FREE eBooks are available at https://www.fadedpage.com.

 

This work is in the Canadian public domain, but may be under copyright in some countries. If you live outside Canada, check your country's copyright laws. IF THE BOOK IS UNDER COPYRIGHT IN YOUR COUNTRY, DO NOT DOWNLOAD OR REDISTRIBUTE THIS FILE.

 

Title: Privy Council Appeal No. 121 of 1928 [Item 5 of 7]; Case of the Attorney-General for the province of Alberta

Date of first publication: 1928

Author: The Lords of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

Date first posted: July 30, 2025

Date last updated: July 30, 2025

Faded Page eBook #20250740

 

This eBook was produced by: Iona Vaughan, Howard Ross & the online Distributed Proofreaders Canada team at https://www.pgdpcanada.net

 


Book cover

See Transcriber’s Notes below.

In the Privy Council.

 

No. 121 of 1928.

‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒

 

 

ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.

 

=============================

In the Matter of a Reference as to the meaning of the word “persons” in Section 24 of The British North America Act, 1867.
 
BETWEEN
 
HENRIETTA MUIR EDWARDS, NELLIE L. McCLUNG, LOUISE C. McKINNEY, EMILY F. MURPHY and IRENE PARLBYAppellants
 
AND
 
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE DOMINION OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTARespondents.

=============================

CASE

OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA.

=============================

   The Attorney-General for the Province of Alberta adopts and relies upon the Case of the Appellants and submits that the appeal should be allowed for the reasons therein mentioned.

J. F. LYMBURN.

N. W. ROWELL.


In the Privy Council.

 

No. 121 of 1928.

‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒‒

 
On Appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada.
 
In the Matter of a Reference as to the meaning of the word “persons” in Section 24 of The British North America Act, 1867.
 
between
 
HENRIETTA MUIR EDWARDS, NELLIE L. McCLUNG, LOUISE C. McKINNEY, EMILY F. MURPHY and IRENE PARLBYAppellants
 
and
 
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE DOMINION OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, and THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTARespondents.
 
=============================
 
CASE
OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR
THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA.
 
=============================

BLAKE & REDDEN,

        17, Victoria Street, S.W.1.


Transcriber’s Notes

This is one of the documents arising from this appeal to the Privy Council. All of the documents in this set were derived from images provided at

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1929/1929_86.html

All original spelling and punctuation have been retained.

[The end of Case of the Respondent the Attorney-General of the Province of Alberta re Privy Council Appeal No. 121 of 1928 [Item 5 of 7] by The Lords of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]